Justin.greenhalgh@stfc.ac.uk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Trench Breaking Up on Harcourt Road/Harcourt Way #5550

    Fully agree with flatbadger. I was that cyclist. There was an surprising amount of blood from a face cut but fortunately I fell towards the verge and missed a large tree. They only fixed a short length and I did have a go at them later about another section about 50m down the road – which after about a couple of years they did fix. AS you both say, the whole trench needs doing and it seems daft to do it a few m at a time. Austerity, I guess. I’ll add my voice to the tumult. Is this a recognised cycle route, in addition to be being a road we all use?

    in reply to: RAL Facilities and Coviod #4901

    I note that the Oxford mail claims work will start today:
    https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/18474307.new-wantage-harwell-cycle-route-work-starts-today/

    Justin.

    in reply to: Nasty rut in Harcourt Road #3817

    Sorry – I meant heading WEST (homebound)

    in reply to: Harwell Campus Travel Survey 2018 #3729

    All,

    the link didn’t come through in the version of the email version of the message I saw; it is

    https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/PXMCLVH

    Cheers -Justin.

    in reply to: Ginge Track Use #3695

    Hi Flatbadger,

    Thanks for this useful reminder. AFAIK we do indeed use Mr Pill’s farm track with permission which may be withdrawn, and I try to be extra polite in the vicinity for that reason. For the first few years after it opened, I used to drop a thank you card and a bunch of flowers and a bottle of wine off to him, sometimes claiming the money back from HarBUG. Would anyone like to take over that duty?

    Justin.

    Hi there, Thanks for letting us all know. I do hope you aren’t put off cycling by a very unpleasant experience. For what it’s worth I’ve been cycling for many years and never had anything of this sort.
    Justin.

    in reply to: HarBUG Events 2016 #2931

    I’d love to know how to true a wheel having changed a broken spoke.

    in reply to: Related to commuting. Super bright lights… #2890

    Warning: hobby horse alert!

    I’ve been dazzled by cyclists coming the other way, both on a bike and in a car, and it’s interesting to see that CTC (http://www.ctc.org.uk/cyclists-library/regulations/lighting-regulations) confirm my suspicion that it’s illegal to do that. The route from RAL to Grove has everything: unlit mud tracks; quiet country lanes; busy roads. For my last set of lights I had some cateye dual tungsten filaments that I was able to rewire to include a dip-switch in reach of my thumb so I could switch from high beam to low beam when I saw people coming the other way. Sadly I haven’t found a way to do the same with my LED ones (Ebay cheapo max lumens per lucre). I haven’t seen any easily dippable LED lights on the market, which I suppose makes it sort of forgivable to cycle around the place dazzling everyone, but only just. But sadly, until easily dipped lights are available and mandated, I suspect being dazzled is just another improvement of modern life we’ll have to put up with. Bah, humbug, my young day, etc. More common sense (and actual relevant data) on this topic here http://www.ctc.org.uk/blog/chris-juden/bobby-dazzlers.

    in reply to: New Science Vale Cycle Map #2755

    Strikes me there is lot of work to do in the Wantage and Grove area if we want to make this complete. I’m struggling to see how complete it aims to be – where can I get a copy of the original Science Vale cycle map (the one that sustrans have been commissioned to update)?

    in reply to: 'Ginge Link' #2552

    It always used to be called “Mr Pill’s track”. You are quite right that the gravel filling in the holes is pretty hopeless for cyclists. But beware that we use it only with his permission as far as I know – any whiff of legal action and all he has to do is shut the gates!

    in reply to: Science Vale Cycle Routes Focus Group #2431

    I would suggest that, under option 1, rather than simply assert that a study has been done, you consider attaching the study.

    in reply to: Wantage Neighbourhood Plan #2333

    Specific problem: Poor connection between Grove and route 544 (formerly route 44)

    Specific suggestion: good on-road cycle provision to link the two, probably incorporated into the proposed development NE of Wantage.

    Justin.

    in reply to: Vale of White Horse Local Plan 2029 – HarBUG Response #1564

    PS – it might be helful to include somewhere a reference to making provision to maintain – not just build – cycle infrastructure.

    Cheers – Justin.

    in reply to: Vale of White Horse Local Plan 2029 – HarBUG Response #1562

    Kevin,

    As usual, thanks for all your work in trawling throught these documents and coming up with a coherent response.

    Justin.

    in reply to: Sensible Cycleways #1407

    Hi Mike, Welcome to the Wantage cycle paths. If you think the bit down Harcourt road is bad, consider what you would do if you approahced the junction that way. I *think* you would have to
    1. find the cyclist’s button hidden behind a chestnut tree
    2. wait in the road where there used to be a mark showing a cyclist’s waiting area, but in practice what you findt there is a transit van
    3. When the lighs change, cross the A338 , cross the pedestrain part of the pavement and cyle up the completely overgrown cycle path in the hedge, trying to avoid the seat in the bus stop which is also on the cycle path.
    4. Cross back over the A338 at the crossing, and carry on to Grove (whre you cross the main road again).

    And don’t get me started on the cycle provision on the other route between Grove and Wantage (past the aeroplane)…

    Funnily enough, we surveyed the facilities a few year ago for the “wantage and grove healthcheck” (which all came to little in the end). One of the things I did was to stand a the A338/harcourt road junction in the morning to watch the kids navigate the junction in the easy direction (from Grove to Wantage). Very few of them use Harcourt road; the ones that do, go up the pavement on the left (north side) of the road. The rest go straight on at the junction, along the A338 – most of them going the wrong way up the cycle path on the right hand side (west) of the A338. I asked a few of them why and they just said it was flatter and quicker to go that way.

    I guess we have to accept that councils can clock up brownie points for installing n miles of cycle paths no matter how badly designed, and the idea of a hierarchy of provision is in all the planning guidelines but hasn’t made it into teh administrative mind.

    Meanwhile, what I do on Harcourt road is to cycle on the road both ways. coing down teh hill on teh way home, I go pretty quickly to avoid holding people up too much, signal right and dive over the road at the bottom, tehn go the wrong way up teh cycle path on teh east side of teh 338, taking care at all teh driveways, til I join the proper cycle path beyond the crossing. I think that’s what most most people do.

    Anyway, rant over – off to read the Sunady papers!

    Justin.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)